Interesting and informative. But the massive number of typos and grammar mistakes degrades the credibility of everything. What happened to proof-reading?
Fair criticism, it does degrade the readability. I had pressed publish after writing my thoughts in the substack template and should have run it through a spell-grammar check before publishing. I took care of it now.
I did want to thank you again for the good article.
You said you "...took care of it..." but as I casually scan down it I don't really notice it being any different.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about: (Corrections **.....**.)
"Finally, this reusability of vehicles in space for orbital transport become**s** one of the biggest moats, presenting to us one of the real blue ocean business strateg**ies** at play in space."
Sorry for being so picky, but it's just a bit of a pet peeve of mine having been involved with the Internet since it's beginning and still clinging to some old fashioned ideas about form, function and accuracy.
Interesting and informative. But the massive number of typos and grammar mistakes degrades the credibility of everything. What happened to proof-reading?
Fair criticism, it does degrade the readability. I had pressed publish after writing my thoughts in the substack template and should have run it through a spell-grammar check before publishing. I took care of it now.
Thanks for the quick reply.
I did want to thank you again for the good article.
You said you "...took care of it..." but as I casually scan down it I don't really notice it being any different.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about: (Corrections **.....**.)
"Finally, this reusability of vehicles in space for orbital transport become**s** one of the biggest moats, presenting to us one of the real blue ocean business strateg**ies** at play in space."
Sorry for being so picky, but it's just a bit of a pet peeve of mine having been involved with the Internet since it's beginning and still clinging to some old fashioned ideas about form, function and accuracy.
Sincerely,
Mike
Mike Jewell
Retired R&D Engineer, Hewlett Packard, Co.
Great DD. Thanks for hours full of hard work
Thank. you. Appreciate your feedback.
Thanks for the amazing article.
Thank you
Hi Soumya. I enjoyed going through this. Wondering if you are still planning to write a Part 2 now that a few things have happened to the storyline.
Hello Septum,
I was really enjoying your DD about Momentus and it helped me a lot.
Could you consider an updated chapter or an addendum regarding their actual fraud claims?
https://spacenews.com/investors-drop-out-of-momentus-spac-deal/
Some information about their core technology seem to be invalid.
Take care and Greetings from Germany
Markus